The Lesser of Two Evils
While the boys debate the greatest lines from old 80's movies, I thought I'd ask this very important question:
You have the opportunity to erase from history either Paris Hilton or Britney Spears. Which do you choose and why?
Remember, you can only erase one of them.
posted by Reese The Law Girl @ 10:57 AM
14 Comments:
Paris Hilton, hands down. As far as a celebrity goes, there is not one single reason for her to exist.
Paris Hilton. Reason? What KOM said.
Hehehe, I had a feeling Paris would get chosen first.
I actually pick Britney. I can't stand being forced to listen to bad music and equally bad singers singing said bad music. I also don't like watching trashy girls walk into public restrooms barefooted (ewww). Or hearing those same girls wax poetic about their loser husbands who have spawned entire villages across the globe. Yuck.
I'm not comfortable with the term "Erase", perhaps if you ...AW, WHO AM I KIDDIN' PARIS DAMNIT!!!
Spears has at least some talent. And if we're going to talk about not being able to sing, why is Madonna still around???
I actually feel kind of bad for Spears. I gather that she isn't too bright (to be fair, Paris seems to work on some reptilian stimulus-response level alone - at least Spears can form sentences). But it's painful watching her gleefully get fleeced by this husband-thing. It's like a slow-motion train wreck.
Paris is just rich and looks weird. If we are going to be force-fed a Hilton, couldn't it be her sister?
LOL, KOM! "Reptilian stimulus-response" That's hot! ;)
Well, at least Madonna was a ground-breaking sex kitten. Brittney is just a late 90's Madonna rip-off. Although, I do give her some credit, like you do. She can form a complete sentence.
I just always have this mental image of Brittney walking into a gas station bathroom with no shoes on. Ewwww...
Hmmmm..I gotta go with Paris. She has no markable talent. That would be fine, but for some reason she thinks she has something to contribute....Her stupidity. The iciing on the cake was the book she wrote. Dave Letterman had a Noble Peace Prize winning professor read exerpts of it. The dicotomy was hilarious.
Paris.
She's a waste of plastic surgeried credit card abusing magazine hogging space famous for nothing.
Britney has contributed to this world by way of uh.... earning her money and is trashy. Paris just inherited it and is trashy.
Money can't buy taste. They both prove that, but at least Britney hasn't shown any home "movies" deliberately to get attention.
I agree with everyone (except Reese, sorry). Paris must be erradicated!!! She is so obnoxious it hurts my head to try and make sense of her existence in the public eye. Just listen to "Screwed" and you will never doubt her uselessness.
I go with Paris. I think Reese feels it should be Britanny because Reese has a lot of similarities with Paris. As a matter of fact I call her Paris all the time just to irritate her. Come on folks give it a try and watch Reese's anger explode!
Does Reese say "That's hot" alot?
Does she own a chihuahua?
Reese isn't dumb OR rich, so it has to be something else.
OMG, is there a Reese sex tape out there?!
Look how quickly "Lisa" is willing to sully my good reputation. I should have never introduced her to blogging. ;p~~~
For the record, I do not like hairless little dogs, I am not rich, I'm certainly not dumb, I do not say "That's hot," AND, and this you must never forget, I am not in a sex tape.
~shudder~
;p
Paris Hilton.. she's just a lucky brat lol. She doesn't work for her money AT ALL... erase her
Oh, well, I can't argue with Kaci on that one. Supporting Rock the Vote and then not voting is just dumb.
I bow to the will of the people. Paris must be erased. ;)
Post a Comment
<< Home